Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 26, 2026.
Public comments (4)
A Villa Los Alamos resident opposed the project, citing removal of 264 trees including century-old oaks, threatened species, dangerous traffic at Highway 12 and Los Alamos, and personal experience being stuck in wildfire evacuation traffic on Montgomery Drive.
Planning Commission — March 26, 2026 · 1:47:57 →Rachel's daughter argued the project is about greed rather than caring for the elderly, and would destroy a meadow with threatened species and trees important to wildlife.
Planning Commission — March 26, 2026 · 1:51:13 →A 30-year Villa Los Alamos resident described noise levels she measured near the Highway 12 interchange, a car crash into her complex, and argued the senior housing is high-cost, not affordable.
Planning Commission — March 26, 2026 · 1:54:25 →Read a closing statement on Rachel's behalf, arguing the niche project serves few residents, benefits a Los Angeles-based board, and advances a cloistered private campus in east Santa Rosa.
Planning Commission — March 26, 2026 · 1:57:30 →