O
Santa Rosa
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

South Santa Rosa Specific Plan

Santa Rosa

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (3)Concerned (10)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
19
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 18, 2026.

Public comments (26)

OpposedLina BlancoAug 18, 2026

A North Bay Organizing Project tenant organizer urged anti-displacement protections, rent stabilization, and just-cause protections for mobile home park residents, citing Harmony Communities' rent hikes and tree removal.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 57:21 →
ConcernedFred AllebachAug 18, 2026

NAACP Housing Committee co-chair noted the plan area's higher Black population share and urged an equity-focused grid of anti-displacement policy options with costs.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:24:31 →
OpposedDuane De WittAug 18, 2026

Criticized the outreach as performative and asked the council to send staff back to the community for a genuinely community-driven alternative.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:19:03 →
SupportiveAbby ArnoldAug 18, 2026

Santa Rosa YIMBY supported the plan's density and connectivity but asked for more density near the urban edge and a future SMART station.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 1:01:31 →
OpposedCaitlin VejbyAug 18, 2026

A Legal Aid of Sonoma County analyst urged preserving mobile home parks as naturally occurring affordable housing, noting the city is far behind on very-low-income housing targets.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 59:38 →
ConcernedFred AllebachAug 13, 2026

Called the plan a modern urban renewal project with high displacement risk, and urged specific anti-displacement measures: a stronger mobile home park closure ordinance, a renter registry, and 40% very low/low-income housing requirements.

Planning Commission — August 13, 2026 · 47:12 →
ConcernedIrene RosarioMar 24, 2026

A 40-plus-year Moorland resident and school board president, asked the Council to consider Moorland for future annexation and to correct the LAFCO report.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 1:03:38 →
ConcernedDuane De WittMar 24, 2026

Roseland resident cautioned against overpromising given fiscal constraints, citing the slow Roseland Creek Concept Plan and city infrastructure backlog.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 2:21:49 →
ConcernedAna DiazMar 24, 2026

Roseland resident asked for better translation at community meetings and raised evacuation concerns about only two exits from the Moorland area.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 1:16:34 →
SupportiveKate BybeeMar 24, 2026

Legal Aid of Sonoma County housing policy analyst urged the Council to treat the anti-displacement strategy as integral to the plan and offered partnership.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 1:14:01 →
SupportiveAdrianna ArrizonMar 24, 2026

Executive director of Health Equity Rising, supported the plan update and asked the Council to center Moorland neighbors and ensure inclusion in annexation.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 1:11:28 →
SupportivePaige D.Mar 24, 2026

Sonoma County Tenants Union member and severely rent-burdened renter urged anti-displacement and anti-gentrification policies.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 1:09:32 →
ConcernedEsther LemusMar 24, 2026

A 55-year Moorland resident described historic flooding and neglect, asking the city to consider Moorland for future annexation.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 1:08:00 →
ConcernedNorma YukichMar 24, 2026

A 43-year Moorland Avenue resident described dangerous walking conditions, missing sidewalks, and inaccessible transit stops, urging the neighborhood be kept a priority.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 1:05:29 →
ConcernedFred AllebachMar 24, 2026

Urged enforceable anti-gentrification and anti-displacement strategies for the majority-Latino plan area and warned against cherry-picking annexation areas.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 48:35 →
SupportiveKen MacNabMar 24, 2026

Representing vacant-land property owners, supported Alternative 2, preferred two smaller parks in Todd Creek area, and advocated a Bellevue Avenue road extension over Robles.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 52:01 →
ConcernedConcepcion DominguezMar 24, 2026

A 13-year Moorland resident speaking in Spanish, asked the Council to ensure Moorland is not left behind in the plan or LAFCO processes.

City Council — March 24, 2026 · 56:04 →
ConcernedFred AllebachMar 10, 2026

Warned of potential displacement from the plan and asked the council to require an anti-displacement strategy upfront.

City Council — March 10, 2026 · 2:34:40 →
ConcernedFred AllebachFeb 26, 2026

Urged the commission to send the alternatives back for a full cost accounting including social costs and displacement risk, and asked for intentional recruitment of anchor tenants like a Hispanic market in Moreland, plus a Spanish-survey extension.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 42:31 →
SupportiveConcepcion DominguezFeb 26, 2026

Speaking in Spanish (translated by Council Member Alvarez), a Moreland resident asked for the plan to prioritize eventual annexation and safer Highway 101 crossings, and asked the city to help install the long-delayed Andy Lopez mural at the park.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 45:31 →
SupportiveIrene RosarioFeb 26, 2026

A 40-year Moreland resident and neighborhood action team member said residents already live as Santa Rosans and want the plan to lay groundwork for annexation, with urgent priority on safer east-west freeway crossings and better bus service.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 50:29 →
SupportiveEsther LemosFeb 26, 2026

A 55-year Moreland resident recalled a promised freeway crossing near Bellevue that never materialized and voiced support for annexation and needed infrastructure.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 53:24 →
ConcernedDavid HarrisFeb 26, 2026

Compared Highway 101 to the Berlin Wall and pressed for at least two more pedestrian/bike overcrossings south of Hearn, noting the gap between plans and the comprehensive transportation plan.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 54:47 →
ConcernedAna DiazFeb 26, 2026

Asked for Spanish interpretation at meetings and a Spanish version of the presentation materials, noting the plan area is majority Latino.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 1:02:31 →
ConcernedJanice KarrmanFeb 26, 2026

Warned that roads and infrastructure must be fixed before more building adds traffic, citing long-delayed road projects and damage from tree removal.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 59:30 →
NeutralGregory FearonFeb 26, 2026

Asked the city to post the plan online in a format where residents can comment line-by-line, like a shared document, to boost public engagement.

Planning Commission — February 26, 2026 · 57:30 →