Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Pura Vida Recovery Services Expansion Appeal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Mother in long-term recovery whose son was helped by Pura Vida; urged compassion and support for the expansion.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:55:42 →Grandmother described her grandson's vaping-related ER visit and urged more recovery beds of Pura Vida's caliber.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:57:01 →Mountain Hawk Drive resident and retired plans examiner raised building code and wildland-urban interface issues in opposition.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:58:12 →Registered nurse and Pura Vida employee said the program is safe, structured, and addresses an existing community problem.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:59:31 →Co-founder of Recovery Transportation Systems spoke in support of Pura Vida's expansion to serve more people.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 4:01:00 →Appellant representing Skyhawk United argued the project fails required findings, eliminates affordable housing, and creates fire evacuation and neighborhood impacts.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:14:48 →Second appellant cited a 600-signature petition against the project and asked the Council to listen to citizens.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:24:18 →Attorney for appellants argued the Planning Commission's findings lack substantial evidence, raised CEQA evacuation analysis gaps, and noted the district's recused representative.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:24:56 →Applicant and co-owner rebutted misconceptions, citing no complaints or police calls, state licensing, supervised care, and ten years of community service.
City Council — March 24, 2026 · 3:31:10 →