Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Del Valle Drive-Thru at 2000 Sebastopol Road→At a glance
- Public comments
- 27
- Last 30 days
- 15
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 13, 2026.
Public comments (27)
Spoke in opposition to the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:39:27 →Spoke in opposition to the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:44:33 →Spoke in opposition to the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:39:04 →Spoke in support of the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:48:14 →Spoke in support of the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:39:04 →Spoke in support of the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:52:11 →Spoke in support of the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:39:04 →Spoke in support of the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:54:01 →Spoke in support of the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:54:14 →Spoke in support of the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:58:20 →Spoke in opposition to the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:59:07 →Spoke in opposition to the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 3:39:04 →The project's engineer from Carlile Macy clarified that Kenmore Lane would only be used for egress.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 4:03:05 →Supported the restaurant but not the project's use of Kenmore Lane.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 4:03:25 →Spoke in opposition to the drive-thru project.
City Council — October 13, 2026 · 4:09:40 →Described exiting Kenmore Lane as like playing Frogger; worried about street parking making the road one-lane.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:12:05 →Supported giving the restaurant a chance, saying traffic exists anyway and the drive-thru won't be as busy as In-N-Out.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:14:10 →Kenmore resident said commercial traffic shouldn't be dumped on a residential street and worried about fire truck access.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:16:30 →25-year Kenmore resident called the traffic study comparison to Fourth Street laughable and cited noise, sideshows, and emergency access.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:18:24 →Longtime resident described near-misses and crashes at Kenmore/Sebastopol, including an uninsured drunk driver incident.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:21:32 →44-year Kenmore resident explained how exiting cars would back up Gardner and Kenmore, making circulation impossible.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:24:48 →40-year resident objected to framing neighborhood opposition as racist, cited accident history, and called the queue plan 'idiocy.'
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:28:17 →Supported the project, saying they drive through the area daily without traffic problems and the improvements would add sidewalks and lighting.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:31:50 →Spoke in support, framing approval as a matter of equity for the Latino community and farmworkers who need quick meal access.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:02:27 →Kenmore Lane resident worried about increased cut-through traffic and cars exiting onto the residential street.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:05:20 →Contractor on Kenmore Lane; said parking spaces overhang the property line and the plan isn't thought out, though he loves the restaurant.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:07:40 →Kenmore resident cited school traffic, no sidewalks, and dark streets as reasons the drive-thru creates more problems than benefits.
Planning Commission — February 12, 2026 · 1:10:20 →