O
Santa Rosa
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

City Hall exchange — creek

Santa Rosa

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 18, 2026.

Public comments (6)

MixedBetty AndrewsAug 18, 2026

A 38-year resident and civil engineer supported the deal but warned the 1.61-acre creek corridor is too narrow and that Sonoma Water staff weren't consulted on the culvert constraint.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:09:17 →
MixedFred AllebachAug 18, 2026

Supported the deal but urged coordination with Sonoma Water on the downtown culvert, which modeling shows could cause major flooding.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:14:06 →
MixedEvan WiigAug 18, 2026

Supported the project conceptually but doubted the narrow 1.61 acres allows meaningful creek daylighting; asked that the creek become a centerpiece.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:15:40 →
SupportiveJoey SmithAug 18, 2026

Urged the strongest possible language in the development agreement to mandate creek daylighting, citing Bend, Oregon as a model.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:18:00 →
SupportiveKevin AndersonAug 18, 2026

Chop's Teen Club director urged making creek daylighting a binding condition with creekside design standards and a public design process.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:20:17 →
MixedEllen Van AllenAug 18, 2026

Supported the agreement but called the culvert a liability far beyond $100 million given climate-driven flooding, urging it be addressed.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:22:31 →