Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 18, 2026.
Public comments (6)
A 38-year resident and civil engineer supported the deal but warned the 1.61-acre creek corridor is too narrow and that Sonoma Water staff weren't consulted on the culvert constraint.
City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:09:17 →Supported the deal but urged coordination with Sonoma Water on the downtown culvert, which modeling shows could cause major flooding.
City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:14:06 →Supported the project conceptually but doubted the narrow 1.61 acres allows meaningful creek daylighting; asked that the creek become a centerpiece.
City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:15:40 →Urged the strongest possible language in the development agreement to mandate creek daylighting, citing Bend, Oregon as a model.
City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:18:00 →Chop's Teen Club director urged making creek daylighting a binding condition with creekside design standards and a public design process.
City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:20:17 →Supported the agreement but called the culvert a liability far beyond $100 million given climate-driven flooding, urging it be addressed.
City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:22:31 →