O
Santa Rosa
← Community
Taxes BudgetCommunity discussion

City Hall exchange

Santa Rosa

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 18, 2026.

Public comments (14)

SupportiveAbby ArnoldAug 18, 2026

Representing Santa Rosa YIMBY, she supported the plan's density and connectivity, and later supported the City Hall exchange while urging creek daylighting.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 2:31:32 →
OpposedDwayne DeWittAug 18, 2026

A Roseland resident criticized the plan outreach as performative, urged a straight exchange with no subsidies for the developer, and asked that the Flock camera meeting give residents equal time.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 2:49:09 →
SupportiveRichard CarlisleAug 18, 2026

A retired civil engineer who helped design downtown projects strongly supported the exchange, calling the site the city's 'front porch' and urging good urban design.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 4:35:10 →
SupportiveDerek StefanAug 18, 2026

A realtor and JC neighborhood resident urged unanimous approval, suggesting a public roof garden and return of the Courthouse Square fountains.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 4:37:34 →
SupportiveAbby ArnoldAug 18, 2026

Santa Rosa YIMBY supported the exchange, saying it will bring people downtown, save money, and uncover Santa Rosa Creek.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:04:14 →
SupportiveRichard CarlileAug 18, 2026

A retired civil engineer who worked on past downtown renewal urged good urban design and praised local developer Hugh Futrell's track record.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:05:33 →
SupportiveDerek StephanAug 18, 2026

A Realtor and son of a local architect urged unanimous approval and suggested a public roof garden and restoring Courthouse Square fountains.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:07:01 →
MixedBetty AndrewsAug 18, 2026

A 38-year resident and civil engineer supported the deal but warned the 1.61-acre creek corridor is too narrow and that Sonoma Water staff weren't consulted on the culvert constraint.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:09:17 →
OpposedDuane De WittAug 18, 2026

Urged the city not to give taxpayer money to the developer and warned about development agreements being violated.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:11:55 →
MixedFred AllebachAug 18, 2026

Supported the deal but urged coordination with Sonoma Water on the downtown culvert, which modeling shows could cause major flooding.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:14:06 →
MixedEvan WiigAug 18, 2026

Supported the project conceptually but doubted the narrow 1.61 acres allows meaningful creek daylighting; asked that the creek become a centerpiece.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:15:40 →
SupportiveJoey SmithAug 18, 2026

Urged the strongest possible language in the development agreement to mandate creek daylighting, citing Bend, Oregon as a model.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:18:00 →
SupportiveKevin AndersonAug 18, 2026

Chop's Teen Club director urged making creek daylighting a binding condition with creekside design standards and a public design process.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:20:17 →
MixedEllen Van AllenAug 18, 2026

Supported the agreement but called the culvert a liability far beyond $100 million given climate-driven flooding, urging it be addressed.

City Council — August 18, 2026 · 3:22:31 →